Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user

[Vadim Antonov <avg () exigengroup com>]

On Sun, 9 Sep 2001, Doug Clements wrote:
> You want h.323, then don't do NAT. This is very simple, and this thread has
> gone on long enough.

Or get an H.323 gateway which combines NAT functions and H.323
"switchboard" (i.e. CTI, conference control, etc).  My previous employer
(Genesys, now part of Alcatel) makes one.
 
--vadim