nanog mailing list archives

Re: unblock communications

From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:17:03 -0700 (PDT)


On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Mitch Halmu wrote:

So that the bandwidth available for mail that is not spam can be reduced?


So that all people and institutions can communicate freely in this national
emergency from wherever they may be found stranded. Or are you too dense to
comprehend who the real enemy is?


Get a fucking life.

Current thread:

unblock communications Mitch Halmu (Sep 11)
- Re: unblock communications Richard Welty (Sep 11)
  - Re: unblock communications Ariel Biener (Sep 11)
- Re: unblock communications Andy Dills (Sep 11)
- Re: unblock communications Joe Abley (Sep 11)
  - Re: unblock communications Mitch Halmu (Sep 11)
    - RE: unblock communications Matt Thoene (Sep 11)
    - Re: unblock communications Jonas Luster (Sep 11)
    - Re: unblock communications Patrick Greenwell (Sep 11)
  - Re: unblock communications E.B. Dreger (Sep 11)
    - Re: unblock communications Steven J. Sobol (Sep 11)
- Re: unblock communications Gordon Ewasiuk (Sep 11)
- RE: unblock communications Alexander Kiwerski (Sep 11)
- Re: unblock communications Steven J. Sobol (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: unblock communications woody weaver (Sep 11)
- RE: unblock communications Joe Blanchard (Sep 11)
  - RE: unblock communications Andy Walden (Sep 12)
    - RE: unblock communications Rob Thomas (Sep 12)
    - RE: unblock communications Alexander Kiwerski (Sep 12)

(Thread continues...)