nanog mailing list archives
RE: AT&T NYC
From: "Derek Samford" <dsamford () fastduck net>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:32:31 -0400
Dmitri, Absolutely unavoidable. I think it's called Dalph Roncaster's Law of Impropability. Derek
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf
Of
Dmitri Krioukov Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:10 PM To: Daniel Golding Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: AT&T NYC daniel, why would you return to that state? -- dima.-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf
Of
Daniel Golding Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:27 PM To: Ralph Doncaster; Peter van Dijk Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: AT&T NYC We now return to our regularly scheduled, low level of signal to
noise.
- Daniel Golding
Current thread:
- RE: AT&T NYC, (continued)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC Mark Kent (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 30)
- RE: AT&T NYC Daniel Golding (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Ralph Doncaster (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Dmitri Krioukov (Aug 29)
- RE: AT&T NYC Derek Samford (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)
- Re: AT&T NYC alex (Aug 29)