nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes)
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 08:42:30 -0700
The USG runs, directly or indirectly, 6 of the 13 root servers,
imiho, it is more important, and undesirable, that the usg controls the *content* of the root zone. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes, (continued)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Brad Knowles (Aug 06)
- RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 06)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Ralph Doncaster (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability John M. Brown (Aug 08)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Patrick (Aug 07)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Brad Knowles (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Stephen Sprunk (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Randy Bush (Aug 09)
- Re: RFC 2870's applicability (Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes) Paul Vixie (Aug 09)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Adam Rothschild (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Chris Woodfield (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Derek Samford (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 07)
- RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 06)
- Re: Deaggregating for emergency purposes bmanning (Aug 06)