nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones
From: "Johannes Ullrich" <jullrich () euclidian com>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 16:37:08 -0400
The record labels don't want to give you that choice. If you read the complaint you'll notice the record companies never attempted to contact the immediate upstream ISP in China. ...
<rant opinion=mine> Well, maybe the record industry doesn't want to interfere with the 'anti-copy' oriented Chinese authorities. Unlike the US, China tightly controls regular xerox copy machines, book printers and other so called 'free press' which could easily be subverted to rob copyright holders left an right. I think the RIAA and the like are right to attack the problem at its source: Free Speech. Well, you may still be able to voice your opinion, as long as you pay for it. </rant>
Current thread:
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean M. Doran (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Paul Vixie (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Johannes Ullrich (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Vadim Antonov (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Paul Vixie (Aug 17)
- Re: Dave Farber comments on Re: Major Labels v. Backbones Sean Donelan (Aug 17)