nanog mailing list archives
RE: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail)
From: "N. Richard Solis" <nrsolis () aol net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 07:32:10 -0400
Sean, For a lot of people, these locations are a place to store an entire web presence. That might include order information or private email or credit card records for an entire day's transactions. My feeling is that the general purpose of security at these locations is to make sure that no one is tampering with any equipment in any way, to include unauthorized removal. That was the point of my previous email. The connections to those machines and the data stored on them is what is of value in those locations, not the physical security of the people. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:03 AM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, David Lesher wrote:
Unnamed Administration sources reported that N. Richard Solis said:If you haven't worked in an environment where you had to turn in your cellphone and pager at the front desk, show a badge to a camera around
every
corner, and get your office keys from a vending machine you dont know
what
real security looks like.You missed the places w/ real security. That's where the very polite Marine Security Guard with the 870 shotgun asks to see your badge again...
Sigh, and in places with "real security" you rarely find enemies/competitors sitting in the same room. Exchange points are like the United Nations, not high security military bases. AMS-IX, Equinix, Linx/Telehouse, PAIX, etc provide a neutral facility for competitors to exchange network traffic. The facility operators provide a reasonable level of security, and try to keep the diplomats from punching each other. Its in all (most?) the competitors' self-interest to follow the rules. Let's not lose sight of the purpose of colocation/exchange points. If we start requiring you to be a US citizen and have top secret clearance in order to enter a colocation facility, we've probably decreased the usefulness of the exchange points.
Current thread:
- RE: your mail, (continued)
- RE: your mail Nathan Stratton (Aug 20)
- RE: your mail N. Richard Solis (Aug 20)
- RE: your mail Patrick (Aug 20)
- Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Sean Donelan (Aug 20)
- Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Jay Adelson (Aug 20)
- Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Patrick (Aug 20)
- Verizon sued by RIAA ? Marshall Eubanks (Aug 20)
- Re: Hovercraft for deliveries to the fifth floor loading dock (was Re: Your mail) Jay Adelson (Aug 20)
- Re: your mail David Lesher (Aug 20)
- Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) Sean Donelan (Aug 20)
- RE: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) N. Richard Solis (Aug 21)
- Re: your mail Martin Hannigan (Aug 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Shared facilities (was Re: your mail) Martin Hannigan (Aug 21)
- Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Sean Donelan (Aug 21)
- Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Mike Leber (Aug 21)
- RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) N. Richard Solis (Aug 21)
- Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Vincent J. Bono (Aug 21)
- RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Deepak Jain (Aug 21)
- RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Gerald (Aug 21)
- Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) Vincent J. Bono (Aug 21)
- EPOs in critical facilities Sean Donelan (Aug 21)