nanog mailing list archives
RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org
From: "Al Rowland" <alan_r1 () corp earthlink net>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 13:25:17 -0700
Then the question becomes, "Is running your own mail server worth <some registration cost>?" Very similar to the "I want my own special part of the Internet (web server)." Okay, pay your $70 for two years (or whatever). BTW, just curious, who announces your MX records? Best regards, _________________________ Alan Rowland -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Larry Rosenman Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:39 PM To: Derek Samford Cc: 'Mark Segal'; 'Robert Blayzor'; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org What about individuals that run their own mail servers? (E.G. me).? On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 14:28, Derek Samford wrote:
I really like this. A sort of IRR for mail servers. Maybe when registered it could even check if the server was an open relay, and not allow those servers to be registered until properly configured. Any thoughts? Derek-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On BehalfOfMark Segal Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 3:12 PM To: 'Robert Blayzor'; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.orgIt's almost to the point to where mail servers need their own "registrar", sort of the way domains are tracked now, track mail servers. Give mail server admins the option to accept mail from registered mail servers only or from any mail server. Of course there would need to be a ramp up period, like six months to a year, to make sure all of your mail servers are registered. And of course one should only be able to register mail servers if the IP space is actually SWIP to them. If the IP space is NOT SWIP, it would need to be registered by the customer ISP or via owners rwhois server. Just my $.02; for what it's worth....Really good idea (no sarcasm, I actually like it).. But what stops spammers from registering their mail server?..Ie.. 1) Get a dsl account 2) Ips get swipped to you 3) Register the server 4) SPAM 5) Apologize, get a second chance 6) get booted off 7) Call the next ISP with a zero install 8) Rinse and repeat. Regards, Mark -- Mark Segal Director, Data Services Futureway Communications Inc. Tel: (905)326-1570
-- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler () lerctr org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
Current thread:
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org, (continued)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Barry Shein (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org william (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Al Rowland (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Barry Shein (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Robert Blayzor (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org J.A. Terranson (Aug 21)
- RE: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Re: IETF SMTP Working Group Proposal at smtpng.org William Warren (Aug 22)