nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!)
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:38:05 -0700
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 07:21:47AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Well, I am convinced that the problem lies in the way the list is set up or the software chosen. I checked approx 50 nanog-l email and almost no email is delivered to me within 5 minutes on this list, when there are 3-5 messages being posted in quick succession the delivery time quickly goes up to 10-15+ minutes.
Are the contents of the nanog list so incredibly important that we must get delivery within 5 minutes or less? If it takes longer than 5 minutes to propagate, do you get your post free? Oh wait, the list is already free...hmm. If you want near-instantaneous mail delivery, you can have it -- for a fee. As in all things, you get what you pay for. Personally, I am quite happy with the list as is -- the new list setup is a vast improvement over what things were just a few months ago. I'm not about to complain over a few minutes. How many of us check our email every few minutes anyway? Perhaps the delay will encourage people to wait, and consider their post before jumping on a thread -- that seems to be the real culprit. --msa
Current thread:
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server??, (continued)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Aug 21)
- Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Randy Bush (Aug 21)
- Die thread, DIE! -> Re: .mil domain root only hosted by one server?? Vinny Abello (Aug 21)
- mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Chris Adams (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Dave Stewart (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 21)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Majdi S. Abbas (Aug 22)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch (Aug 22)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jim Popovitch (Aug 23)
- RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Jeffrey Haas (Aug 26)
- Re[3]: Die thread, DIE!) Richard Welty (Aug 23)
- Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread, DIE!) Brad Knowles (Aug 22)