nanog mailing list archives
RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
From: "Barry Raveendran Greene" <bgreene () cisco com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:23:09 -0800
IMHO - The RIRs are doing their part. They announce to the operations aliases their intention to allocate a new block before they start doing it. People like me (with the ingress-prefix-template), Rob Thomas (with the bogon template), and Steve Gill (with the Junos flavor of the ingress-prefix-template) start tweaking our templates and post them to the community. After that, it would be up to each operations team to execute within their own network. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Adam "Tauvix" Debus Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:16 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
So for the sake of argument, in your proposal an ISP could filter all
of
the blocks that the RIRs allocate out of and hamstring them
indefinitely?
Perhaps not, but an X month period after the inital allocation to the RIR where they don't assign out of that pool might be wise. Perhaps e-mails can be sent to the registered contacts of existing IP space upon initial allocation, on the first of each month, and then on the last day of the hold. I know that I am sometimes a bit too busy to take care of something like that at the very instant I get the e-mail, and that it can fall to the wayside. Many times a reminder e-mail has come at a moment where I was able do to something about it. Thanks, Adam "Tauvix" Debus Linux Certified Professional, Linux Certified Administrator #447641 Network Administrator, ReachONE Internet adam () reachone com
Current thread:
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8..., (continued)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Joe Provo (Dec 04)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Todd A. Blank (Dec 03)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Todd A. Blank (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Michael . Dillon (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Joe Abley (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Alec H. Peterson (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Stephen Sprunk (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Alec H. Peterson (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Adam "Tauvix" Debus (Dec 06)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Barry Raveendran Greene (Dec 06)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Sean Donelan (Dec 06)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Alec H. Peterson (Dec 06)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Alec H. Peterson (Dec 06)
- RE: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Sean Donelan (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Jared Mauch (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Jonathan Disher (Dec 07)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Joe Abley (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Ralph Doncaster (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... jlewis (Dec 06)
- Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 06)