nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs?
From: "Tony Rall" <trall () almaden ibm com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:11:01 -0800
On Wednesday, 2002/02/20 at 09:08 PST, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
[0] - corollary: qos mechanisims decide which packets to drop. but isps are paid not to drop any packets.
Exactly. I've been saying this to vendors for the last few years, as they try to push their QOS mechanisms on me. I'm not in the business of trying to engineer some optimum packet discard strategy. I would rather spend my time and money trying to minimize the drop percentage. (I haven't been tested yet with the task of trying to minimize or standardize latency for traffic like VOIP - might change my tune if I was dealing with that.) Tony Rall
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs?, (continued)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Randy Bush (Feb 20)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Alex Rubenstein (Feb 20)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Jon Mansey (Feb 20)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 20)
- RE: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Steve Naslund (Feb 20)
- RE: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 20)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Stephen Sprunk (Feb 20)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Randy Bush (Feb 20)
- Re: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Dave Israel (Feb 20)
- RE: Cisco PPP DS-3 limitations - 42.9Mbpbs? Steve Naslund (Feb 20)