nanog mailing list archives
Re: Satellite latency
From: Chrisy Luke <chrisy () flix net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:08:34 +0000
Simon Lyall wrote (on Feb 27):
Thats about it, the whole thing isn't rocket science, packets go from A to B and take a bit longer to get their. You have asymetric routing but the only problems that happen is that US NOC admins run around screaming when you tell them about it.
I remember trying to exlpain to some US NOC that yes, our satellite uplink is in London, with a UK company, yes, hosted in London and that yes, the customer is in Israel, dialng up to an Israeli ISP with an IP address in Israel that we happen to advertise transit for in London. And yes, it does work. This particular bastardisation used a multihop BGP session for the Israeli ISP to advertise a netblock to us, which we transited. While this session was in place, traffic towardsd clients went over the satellite. Without it, it ended up going to Israel, via the clients dialup. I love simple solutions for resilience. Honestly. Some people just needed a bit of imagination. Chris. -- == chris () easynet net T: +44 845 333 0122 == Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC F: +44 845 333 0122
Current thread:
- Re: Satellite latency, (continued)
- Re: Satellite latency Michael Painter (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Jim Mercer (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Joe Abley (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Tony Hain (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Rowland, Alan D (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Dickson, Brian (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Simon Lyall (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Chrisy Luke (Feb 27)
- Re: Satellite latency Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 27)
- RE: Satellite latency Jeb R. Linton (Feb 28)
- Re: Satellite latency Clayton Fiske (Feb 28)