Re: ICANN dead?

[Christopher Schulte <schulte+nanog-post () nospam schulte org>]

At 07:23 PM 1/16/2002 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> Just another example of the guardians of "Internet stability" exhibiting
> their true level of suitability for the task.

Oh please.  Didn't we go over this mid November, 2001?

http://www.icann.org/ ( which is available from my workstation just fine, 
by the way ) is not a critical part of the operational stability of the 
internet as a whole.  It may have been unavailable.  If so, big deal.  Move on.

Enough said.

> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
>                                Patrick Greenwell
>                      Stealthgeeks,LLC. Operations Consulting
>                           http://www.stealthgeeks.net
> \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/


--chris