nanog mailing list archives
RE: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care?
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf () tndh net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 17:22:30 -0800
Dickson, Brian wrote:
A good rule of thumb (possibly from RFC 822) is, be liberal in what you accept and strict in what you send.
While it has appeared in several docs, the earliest I have found is RFC760 (not to be confused with the most prophetic RFC706 - On the junk mail problem) which was the predecessor to RFC791 - IPv4. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care?, (continued)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Dave Israel (Jan 17)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Joel Baker (Jan 20)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Susan Hares (Jan 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Susan Hares (Jan 18)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Jake Khuon (Jan 18)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Christopher A. Woodfield (Jan 19)
- recommendation for open source based Arman (Jan 18)
- RE: recommendation for open source based Christopher J. Wolff (Jan 18)
- RE: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Tony Hain (Jan 17)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Brett Frankenberger (Jan 18)
- Re: Persistent BGP peer flapping - do you care? Susan Hares (Jan 18)