nanog mailing list archives
Re: traffic filtering
From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin () rcn com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:48:52 -0500 (EST)
In the referenced message, Walter Klomp said:
As far as I know .0 and .255 are network and broadcast addresses respectively, NEVER should a workstation be configured on these addresses, unless something drastically changed in the RFC's for IPv4 which I am not aware of...
only on a /24. on /0 - /23 only the first .0 is network, and the last .255 broadcast. on /25-/30 it depends on where the network begins and ends. /31 has no directed broadcast. /32 is a single host and similarly has no directed broadcast.
I for one am filtering .0 and .255 at my border routers, and also rate limiting echo at a reasonable rate... and have never gotten a complaint about people not being able to reach or be reached... Walter Klomp
Current thread:
- Re: traffic filtering, (continued)
- Re: traffic filtering Avleen Vig (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering E.B. Dreger (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering J.F. Noonan (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering J.F. Noonan (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Jay Ford (Jan 24)
- Re: traffic filtering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 24)
- Re: traffic filtering Niels Bakker (Jan 27)
- Re: traffic filtering E.B. Dreger (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Matthew S. Hallacy (Jan 23)