RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"

["Greg Pendergrass" <greg () band-x com>]

Absolutely. If one goes to an all-you-can-eat buffet and has 4 plates of
food, can the restaurant complain to them? Of course not, unless they have a
definition of unlimited I don't know of. If you advertise unlimited access
to a customer then they can use it as much as they want to, by definition.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of
Steven J. Sobol
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Greg Pendergrass
Cc: Rowland, Alan D; nanog () merit edu
Subject: RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"



On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:

> It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100%
of
> what they pay for.

So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
$20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?

--
JustThe.net LLC - Steve "Web Dude" Sobol, CTO      ICQ: 56972932/WebDude216
website: http://JustThe.net  email: sjsobol () JustThe net  phone: 216.619.2NET
postal: 5686 Davis Drive, Mentor On The Lake, OH 44060-2752  DalNet: ZX-2