nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint peering policy
From: Nigel Titley <nigel () titley com>
Date: 02 Jul 2002 17:02:42 +0000
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 17:53, Paul Vixie wrote:
What is the connection between unregulated peering and the financial difficulties we have seen? The problems have been caused by: - Bad business models - Greed - Corporate officers who have shirked their fudiciary responsibilities to the stockholders If you can somehow tie peering into this, please be my guest, but it would be a bit of a stretch.you've asked and answered your own question, though. remember, wcom tried to buy sprint and it was only the EU's antitrust folks who stopped them.
And I like to think that my demonstration of the insane paths that packets travelled to Wcom, which I made to the anti-trust tribunal at the time, helped to get that purchase stopped.
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint peering policy, (continued)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Paul Vixie (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Nigel Titley (Jul 02)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Lesher (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 02)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Deepak Jain (Jul 01)