nanog mailing list archives
RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links?
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:06:27 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
Hello Alex, I'd say this sounds obvious, but may be deceptively so... If you are taking a pipe capable of 1000 mbit, and rate-limiting it to 311 mbit, the logic used may be: In the last 1000 msec have there been more than 311mbits? If yes: drop.
Except, we're at the levels of 100 kbit/second in our tests. I did just find CSCdr94172, which might be related. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- Ok, I give up - Pipeline 75 Dennis L. Shreve (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Scott Weeks (Jul 16)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Alex Rubenstein (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Phil Rosenthal (Jul 15)
- RE: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 16)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Vincent J. Bono (Jul 15)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Martin Hannigan (Jul 16)
- Re: fractional gigabit ethernet links? Paul Vixie (Jul 18)