nanog mailing list archives

Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency


From: "Brian" <bri () sonicboom org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:36:03 -0700


bwahaha, 2 funnee.  I gotta think most people would be thinking of adding
another ds3 at that point.

    Bri

----- Original Message -----
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr () isprime com>
To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <alex () nac net>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 6:05 PM
Subject: RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency



40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?

--Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of
Alex Rubenstein
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:27 PM
To: Derek Samford
Cc: nanog () merit edu
Subject: Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency




Yes, it's horrid. I've been peering with PSI for going on three years,
and it's never been as bad as it is now.

oddly enough, we see 30+ msec across a DS3 to them, which isn't that
loaded (35 to 40 mb/s).

Then, behind whatever we peer with, we see over 400 msec, with 50% loss,
during business hours.



On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:


There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
having
latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by
Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were
experiencing earlier?

Derek


-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --





Current thread: