nanog mailing list archives
RE: debugging packet loss
From: "Phil Rosenthal" <pr () isprime com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:23:59 -0400
--- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Jason Lewis Isn't ping the first thing to be dropped in favor of other traffic? I remember a similar issue and Cisco saying that was the behavior. Don't quote me on that. jas --- Even if it is, that still means that other packets could be lost had those pings not been there. --Phil
Current thread:
- debugging packet loss Ralph Doncaster (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Jason Lewis (Jul 23)
- RE: debugging packet loss Phil Rosenthal (Jul 23)
- RE: debugging packet loss Andy Dills (Jul 23)
- RE: debugging packet loss Phil Rosenthal (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Wes Bachman (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Daniel Roesen (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Jason Lewis (Jul 23)