nanog mailing list archives

Re: Draft of Rep. Berman's bill authorizes anti-P2P hacking


From: Petr Swedock <petr () blade-runner mit edu>
Date: 26 Jul 2002 13:35:14 -0400


batz <batsy () vapour net> writes:

On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Daniel Golding wrote:

:I wouldn't bet on these guys holding off for "liability" reasons. They have
:vast legions of lawyers, and a shortage of good sense, as well as a very
:loose grasp of the technology.

Not that I agree with them, but given the state of the EULA's that users
accept before running software, I don't see how what they intend to
do as illegal. 

If there were hooks in M$ code for this kind of vigilante DRM enforcement, 
and given that M$ can do anything it wants to your computer based on their
Windows EULA's, is it still "hacking" if it executing a feature of
the software 
which you have already agreed to the licensing conditions of?

Has the Windows EULA (or any EULA) been tested in court?

Big huge IANAL here but..

square(IANAL) for me... 

Peace,

Petr


Current thread: