nanog mailing list archives
RE: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems?
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 11:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Rowland, Alan D wrote:
AFAIK standard (non-proprietary) CompactFlash, SmartCards, Memory Stick, et al, are seen as (removable) storage with typical allowed attributes. I can set a file/folder/card to 'locked' in my camera but when plugged into the computer this will show as 'read only.'
"read-only" is a filesystem attribute. You can still format the card and kill the filesystem. Not good for a secure router. The only consumer flash card with physical write protect switch is the "Secure Digital" stuff, afaik. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems?, (continued)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? E.B. Dreger (May 23)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Henry Yen (May 23)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Andrew Brown (May 24)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Dan Hollis (May 23)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Joseph T. Klein (May 23)
- Write Only was Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Joseph T. Klein (May 23)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Greg A. Woods (May 23)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? David Lesher (May 24)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Scott Granados (May 24)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Joseph T. Klein (May 23)
- RE: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Rowland, Alan D (May 24)
- RE: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Dan Hollis (May 24)
- RE: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? Rowland, Alan D (May 24)
- Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems? E.B. Dreger (May 23)