nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: Eliot Lear <lear () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 17:15:50 -0700
Deepak Jain wrote:
MY question is -- How do you know if a justification for _public_ space handling a large NAT'd pool is the proper size and not an over/under allocation based on the customer in question?
Why is the answer to this question any different than it has been since BCP-12? The answer is that we don't, but we guard against the problem with methods such as slow start allocations.
Eliot
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (Apr 30)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Roland Dobbins (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Michael Painter (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Joe Abley (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? michael thomas guldan (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)