nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP renumbering timeframe
From: David R Huberman <daveid () panix com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 20:17:32 -0400 (EDT)
I'm not a lawyer and cannot answer the questions you pose. However I fail to see why the interesting legal principles you are espousing have anything to do with the original topic of this thread: an upstream revoking an assignment upon the severing of its relationship with its downstream.
Current thread:
- RE: IP renumbering timeframe, (continued)
- RE: IP renumbering timeframe Daniel Golding (May 06)
- RE: IP renumbering timeframe Ralph Doncaster (May 06)
- RE: IP renumbering timeframe Scott Granados (May 06)
- RE: IP renumbering timeframe Ralph Doncaster (May 06)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David Schwartz (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David R Huberman (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David Schwartz (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David R Huberman (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David R Huberman (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David Schwartz (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David R Huberman (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe David Schwartz (May 09)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe Stephen Griffin (May 06)
- Re: IP renumbering timeframe Scott Granados (May 06)