nanog mailing list archives
Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?
From: David Charlap <David.Charlap () marconi com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:06:26 -0400
Jim Hickstein wrote:
One clarification: Can these users relay through that host, using SMTP AUTH, from anywhere, or only from within your network? I observe, for instance, that the instructions for Outlook 2000 (Windows) does not have them check "my [outgoing SMTP] server requires authentication". If the former, great! I'll inform my affected customers. If the latter, they'll have to fool with settings as they move around -- which you no doubt already know is asking too much of 99% of the population. :-)
According to a message posted to one of the EL support newsgroups a while back, they run a separate SMTP AUTH mail server that will work as you describe. It's not the same server that customers use from an EL line, however. I haven't actually used this server. I also don't know if it's a permenant thing or if it's just an experiment at this time. -- David
Current thread:
- Re: e-postage yet again, was anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?, (continued)
- Re: e-postage yet again, was anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Nathan J. Mehl (May 05)
- Re: e-postage yet again, was anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 05)
- Re: e-postage yet again, was anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Nathan J. Mehl (May 05)
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Bruce Campbell (May 05)
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- RE: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? Jim Hickstein (May 09)
- Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet? David Charlap (May 10)