nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects)
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 10:28:34 -0400 (EDT)
traffic. If you're going to have to negotiate bilateral agreements to cover the bulk of your peering traffic, why not consistantly negotiate bilateral agreements?
Randy (Group Telecom) snubbed me when I asked to peer at TorIX. Group Telecom is on the AADS MLPA. AT&T Canada has a tough policy re peering as well, and is on the AADS MLPA. I'm sure there are others among the AADS MLPA signatories that would refuse bilateral peering if I approached them. -Ralph
Current thread:
- Re: Interconnects, (continued)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects todd glassey (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Paul Vixie (May 17)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Paul Vixie (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Simon Lockhart (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Majdi S. Abbas (May 18)
- Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Ralph Doncaster (May 19)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Daniel Golding (May 22)
- RE: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects) Patrick W. Gilmore (May 23)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- RE: Interconnects Daniel Golding (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Paul Vixie (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects E.B. Dreger (May 17)