nanog mailing list archives

Re: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems?


From: Nathan Stratton <nathan () robotics net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:15:29 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 23 May 2002, Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:

And that's MY real question.  Who has actually done this in a production
environment that can speak with some real experience on the topic?  What
can you replace with a linux box to route and run BGP for you in real
life?  A 7200?  Bigger.

I ran a 100% PC router network for almost 2 years. I used them from 
everything from edge aggregation to core routers. You can make BGP do 
whatever you want in real life on a PC. I used modified GateD code and 
after some work became very happy with it. 
 
I don't have the facilities to try these things out for real, and
frankly would be worried about the uptime and finding the RIGHT PC
hardware that isn't complete junk.

Yes, you need to build your own. 

So I guess it's really two questions: what is a PC capable of replacing
as far as throughput goes, and just how reliable can a clone (or pick
your manufacturer) be compared to a unit that was designed by electronic
engineers to function as a 24x7 mission critical box?

When you want to push over 30 meg you are better off looking at something 
other then a x86 to route packets.


<>
Nathan Stratton                         CTO, Exario Networks, Inc.
nathan at robotics.net                  nathan at exario.net
http://www.robotics.net                 http://www.exario.net


Current thread: