nanog mailing list archives

Re: sprint passes uu?


From: Brian <bri () sonicboom org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:20:14 -0700 (PDT)


Their acctg issues are widely known, as well as their 99 pricing in 2001.
Hook up with a customer of theirs as a provider and let the provider duke
it out with em.  A lot of folks like to dual home with Sprint and UUnet,
and that solution does get you a lot from a networking perspective.

        Bri


On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, chuck goolsbee wrote:


transit prices have been in free fall, and worldcom has not been following
them downward.  however, after the cleansing ritual of chapter 11, i think
they will be in a fine position to reset their per-megabit charges in ways
that make them a compelling transit provider.  their network's been great.
--
Paul Vixie


Yes, the network is, and always has been great. (well, except for
that one little blip a couple of weeks ago...) In our seven year
relationship we were always impressed with the the NOC staff and
support group at UUnet.

However auditing their invoices was always an exercise in
frustration. Circuits that were long-ago cancelled re-appearing time
and time again, blatant overcharges, completely incomprehensible
account number changes. I used to think it was incompetence or
confusion caused by growth and acquisitions (having some personal
experience with the latter.) I guess it has been recently revealed as
felonious behavior. I'd be a fool to go down that path again.

I'm sorry to say but, I'll be officiating ice hockey games in hell
before doing business with UUnet again.

--

Chuck Goolsbee                          V.P. Technical Operations
_________________________________________________________________
digital.forest                      Phone: +1-877-720-0483, x2001
where Internet solutions grow              Int'l: +1-425-483-0483
19515 North Creek Parkway                    Fax: +1-425-482-6871
Suite 208                                   http://www.forest.net
Bothell, WA 98011                            email: cg () forest net



Current thread: