nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS issues various
From: Doug Barton <DougB () DougBarton net>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Simon Waters wrote:
Last time it was discussed I thought that the provisions already in the DNS RFC's to allow zone transfer for "." to recursive servers is a neat solution for the root zone.
There are pluses and minuses to that approach. The people at .biz and .info are _still_ getting complaints from people sitting behind broken resolvers with bogus copies of the root zone. Doing this in a widespread manner is likely to lead to more problems of this sort for new TLD's, and updates to existing ones. Also, if you consider that <some high percentage> of root server queries are for the same say, 10 TLD's, and that those records are cached for 2 days, it would most likely be a net increase in root server traffic to have millions of resolvers slaving the zone. Speaking only for myself, I think the combination of anycast and DNSSEC has the best chance of success; both for the root and gTLD servers. Doug
Current thread:
- DNS issues various Simon Waters (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Doug Barton (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNS issues various Randy Bush (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Richard Forno (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Kelly J. Cooper (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Kelly J. Cooper (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Barry Shein (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Sean Donelan (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Barry Shein (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Peter Salus (Oct 24)
- Re: DNS issues various Richard Forno (Oct 24)