nanog mailing list archives
RE: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks
From: fingers <fingers () fingers co za>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:11:19 +0200 (SAST)
Agreed 100%, but Gov't (being run by lawyers) is well accustomed to defining what the meaning of 'is' is. If they dictate that ISPs employ "DDoS Protection", they will define what "DDoS Protection" means 'for the purposes of this policy'.
ah ok the point I was trying to make is, there are steps that can be taken to mitigate/reduce the affects of DDoS. I do not believe there is any complete way to "protect against a DDoS". perhaps I'm just being pedantic. perhaps the clarity you mention would be a good thing for other areas too :)
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks, (continued)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- ICMP filtering, was Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Rob Thomas (Oct 29)
- Re: ICMP filtering, was Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Rafi Sadowsky (Oct 29)
- Re: ICMP filtering, was Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Rob Thomas (Oct 30)
- Message not available
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Brett Frankenberger (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Peter E. Fry (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- RE: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks fingers (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks bob (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Jared Mauch (Oct 29)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 30)
- Re: ICANN Targets DDoS Attacks Crist J. Clark (Oct 31)
- Provider feedback Derek Samford (Oct 31)