nanog mailing list archives

Re: How to secure the Internet in three easy steps


From: dgold <dgold () FDFNet Net>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:49:20 -0600 (CST)


Blocking ports 137-139 is of great benefit to the vast majority of their
customers. It is also of benefit to AT&T, as it cuts down on support
calls. Of course, documenting this would be good.

- Daniel Golding

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Joe wrote:


I Second that.

AT&T  blocks ports (depending where you are) but won't come
right out and say it. On a call to them over a year ago
while testing DSL versus Cable in San Jose, it took almost an hour to get
them to admit that they were blocking ports 137-139, and even then there
was no formal acknowledgement of this blocking.
If I was a betting man, which I'm not, I'd bet on them blocking udp 53 as
well.

No standard as I see it, depends on the child company managing the cable
service.

Just my  2?s tho
-Joe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Barnhart" <flaboy () fdt net>
To: "Matthew S. Hallacy" <poptix () techmonkeys org>
Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: How to secure the Internet in three easy steps



Not really

On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote:


On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 02:35:23PM -0500, Eric M. Carroll wrote:

Sean,

At Home's policy was that servers were administratively forbidden. It
ran proactive port scans to detect them (which of course were subject
to
firewall ACLs) and actioned them under a complex and changing rule
set.
It frequently left enforcement to the local partner depending on
contractual arrangements. It did not block ports. Non-transparent
proxing was used for http - you could opt out if you knew how.

While many DSL providers have taken up filtering port 25, the cable
industry practice is mostly to leave ports alone. I know of one large

Untrue, AT&T filters the following *on* the CPE:

Ports  / Direction / Protocol

137-139 -> any Both UDP
any -> 137-139 Both UDP
137-139 -> any Both TCP
any -> 137-139 Both TCP
any -> 1080 Inbound TCP
any -> 1080 Inbound UDP
68 -> 67    Inbound UDP
67 -> 68    Inbound UDP
any -> 5000 Inbound TCP
any -> 1243 Inbound UDP

And they block port 80 inbound TCP further out in their network.
Overall,
cable providers more heavily than cable providers.

I'd say that AT&T represents a fair amount of the people served via
cable
internet.


Regards,

Eric Carroll

--
Matthew S. Hallacy                            FUBAR, LART, BOFH
Certified
http://www.poptix.net                           GPG public key
0x01938203




-------------------------
Joseph Barnhart
Florida Digital Turnpike
Network Administrator
http://www.fdt.net
http://www.agilitybb.net
-------------------------








Current thread: