nanog mailing list archives
Re: no ip forged-source-address
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper () skriver dk>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:17:52 +0100
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 03:44:12PM +0000, variable () ednet co uk wrote:
Therefore, would it be a reasonable suggestion to ask router vendors to source address filtering in as an option[1] on the interface and then move it to being the default setting[2] after a period of time?
Cannot be done, I certainly doesn't want RPF check to be default enabled on all interfaces on my routers, think for a second about asymmetric routing WITHIN the ISP network. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Senior network engineer @ AS3292, TDC Tele Danmark One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
Current thread:
- no ip forged-source-address variable (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Jesper Skriver (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address variable () ednet co uk (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Jesper Skriver (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address variable () ednet co uk (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Lars Erik Gullerud (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Jared Mauch (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Hank Nussbacher (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Barney Wolff (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Craig A. Huegen (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Jared Mauch (Oct 30)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Petri Helenius (Oct 30)
- RE: no ip forged-source-address Tony Hain (Oct 30)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: no ip forged-source-address Jesper Skriver (Oct 30)