Re: Provider feedback Aleron=BAD!

["Charles H. Gucker" <cgucker () cv net>]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:56:22PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically, they don't qualify.


Alex,
        Even if they weren't multihomed, they have every right
to go to ARIN to request address space (provided they could
justify >= a /20 allocation).  Being multihomed only helps
build the case, but is not a requirement.

It's all on their website:

        http://www.arin.net/policy/ipv4.html#requirements

charles

> On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, E.B. Dreger wrote:
>
> > TT> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:10:01 -0600
> > TT> From: Tech Team1
> >
> >
> > TT> Since we had about 16 /24s (well utilized) this was going to
> >
> > And you didn't approach ARIN for PI space?
> >
> >
> > Eddy
> > --
> > Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
> > Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
> > Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
> > Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
> > From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
> > To: blacklist () brics com
> > Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
> >
> > These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
> > Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to
> > be blocked.
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben --
> --    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --