nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP address fee??
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 11:08:49 +0100 (BST)
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, cw wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:06:29 +0100 (BST), Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:Really? So a customer who claims to need a /24 on a dialup doesnt suggest to you that they're wrong or at least worthy of further investigation before you assign it?The original sender said "justify" not "claim".
Misread that a little :) it is more aimed at the first poster then not the one I responded to! Well my point is that justify or claim I'd pay more attention to the seemingly ok /24 request on a dialup than I would to one for an OC3.
Current thread:
- Re: IP address fee??, (continued)
- Re: IP address fee?? Forrest W. Christian (Sep 05)
- Message not available
- Re: IP address fee?? Ted Fischer (Sep 06)
- Re: IP address fee?? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? David Schwartz (Sep 05)
- Re: IP address fee?? bdragon (Sep 08)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? cw (Sep 09)
- Re: IP address fee?? Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 09)