nanog mailing list archives
Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs
From: neil () DOMINO ORG (Neil J. McRae)
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:02:50 +0100 (BST)
Just cause there are unprotected WLANs dosn't imply that spammers use them (perhaps its to hard for the spammers ;)). Corporations should protect ther WLANs but saying that spamming is a great threat is to overdo it.
I agree, but people said that the spammers wouldn't be able to deal with BGP route advertisement but there was cases of spammers injecting routes sending out spam then removing those routes. Wlan is easy. Neil. -- Neil J. McRae - Alive and Kicking neil () DOMINO ORG
Current thread:
- Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs blitz (Sep 10)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Joel Jaeggli (Sep 10)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs John Angelmo (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Neil J. McRae (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs John Angelmo (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Neil J. McRae (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs John Angelmo (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs John Angelmo (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs David Lesher (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Niels Bakker (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Neil J. McRae (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Stephen Stuart (Sep 11)
- RE: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Al Rowland (Sep 11)
- Re: Drive-by spam hits wireless LANs Jared Mauch (Sep 11)