nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP over in-ground cable applications.
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme () multicasttech com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:33:58 -0400
It is not quite clear to me what you have in mind - do you want to send exclusively IP television over the cable system, or do you want to fit
IP into an existing system ?Current cable systems have separate parts of the spectrum reserved for analogue or digital television channels and the inbound and outbound IP.
DOCSIS is a standard for sending data over a HFC system - see http://www.cablemodem.com/ There is lots of hardware for this from different vendors.If you want a new technology system, I would recommend multicast IP MPEG-2 over EPON - maybe in conjunction with MPLS - see
http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/epon/topic04.htmlIf you are interested in setting up these multicasts or for content to put inside of this walled garden, please let me know :)
I do not think that this is really germane to NANOG. Regards Marshall Eubanks Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
Nathan, If your MPEG2 video were multicast streams, wouldn't that be a much more effective utilization of bandwidth? Regards, Christopher J. Wolff, CIO Broadband Laboratories, Inc.http://www.bblabs.com-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Nathan Stratton Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:29 AM To: Christopher J. Wolff Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:Greetings, Can anyone recommend a method for integrating TCP/IP with an existing analog cable television network. The cable companies do this quitewell; however, it's not immediately clear to me how I would multiplex the IP traffic and the existing video and deliver it to a home.Ya, build a new two-way HFC network.My current thoughts on this are to digitize the satellite video into mpeg2 and deliver it over TCP/IP through the in-ground cable. This way, integrating the video and data portion are easy, however the resident would need to buy a mpeg2 set-top-box to split out the video and internet. Thank you very much for your consideration.The issue is you only have 125 CMTS channels to deal with and most network have way to many homes passed per head end to make mpeg2 over IP practical solution.<>Nathan Stratton nathan at robotics.net http://www.robotics.net
-- T.M. Eubanks Multicast Technologies, Inc. 10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609 e-mail : tme () multicasttech com http://www.multicasttech.com Test your network for multicast : http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/ Status of Multicast on the Web : http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
Current thread:
- IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Nathan Stratton (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Deepak Jain (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. David G. Andersen (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Marshall Eubanks (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Nathan Stratton (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Majdi S. Abbas (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Petri Helenius (Sep 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Miquel van Smoorenburg (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- Re: IP over in-ground cable applications. Vinny Abello (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. sal . sabella (Sep 12)
- RE: IP over in-ground cable applications. Christopher J. Wolff (Sep 12)