nanog mailing list archives
Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings
From: Tony Rall <trall () almaden ibm com>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 16:02:49 -0600
On Sunday, 2002-09-22 at 17:06 AST, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:
Although I think it is a mistake to think a wireless network security is different than using any other network you don't control. Most wireless security tutorials tend to concentrate on "securing" the wireless network instead of how to communicate over an untrusted network.
There is no way to make the NANOG wireless setup "trusted"; you'd be better off putting effort into securing communications on an untrusted net. Tony Rall
Current thread:
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Tony Rall (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Tony Rall (Sep 22)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Steven M. Bellovin (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings JC Dill (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Huopio Kauto (Sep 23)
- Re: Wireless insecurity at NANOG meetings Greg Maxwell (Sep 23)