nanog mailing list archives
Re: AP IX locations
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:39:49 -0400
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:36:02AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
sadly the best spot to interconnect is not in the AP region, its in Palo Alto.Is this really still true?
I would not be surprised to find that it is. Asia Pacific is an enormous region with lots of inconvenient ocean all over it. An in-region strategy which works for peering with Japan or Hong Kong or Korea is unlikely to put you close to a large number of New Zealand operators, to give an extreme example. Given the enormous scope of the question, the US west coast almost sounds like an effective common denominator *regardless* of the state of interconnection within the region, or the history of US-centric traffic demand and under-sea cable routes.
In Japan there are 4 IXes I'm aware of (JPIX and NSPIXP-2 being the largest). In Hong Kong, HKIX is (last I heard) pretty popular. In Korea, I'm told there are quite a few Ixes. There is some intra-Asia meshing going on (including both carriers as well as efforts like ABONE).
I think a question about the best place to peer within Asia is more likely to have interesting answers than the question about Asia Pacific. Joe
Current thread:
- Re: AP IX locations, (continued)
- Re: AP IX locations Dorian Kim (Sep 29)
- RE: AP IX locations James Spenceley (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations David Luyer (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations David Conrad (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations German Martinez (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Lane Patterson (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations ren (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Paul Vixie (Sep 28)
- Re: AP IX locations Scott Granados (Sep 29)
- Re: AP IX locations Joe Abley (Sep 26)
- Re: AP IX locations Scott Granados (Sep 30)
- Re: AP IX locations Paul Vixie (Sep 30)
- List of members at LAAP ?? Re: AP IX locations John M. Brown (Sep 30)