nanog mailing list archives

Re: layer 3 switch debate


From: Charles Sprickman <spork () inch com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 16:08:19 -0400 (EDT)


Does anyone know who is actually running "switches" in the core?  The only
example I'm aware of is Telocity, and I'm not sure if they are still doing
that.  They use(d?) Foundry gear.

--
Charles Sprickman
spork () inch com


On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Stephen Sprunk wrote:


Thus spake "ip dude" <ipdude () cattle-today com>
so it is your opinion that a Catalyst 6509 (i.e. Layer 3 switch) is equivalent
to a 7206 or GSR? Of course, this is in regard to 'core' routing device in the
middle of a national IP network. This network in question just happens to
utilize a lot of GE LH interconnections.

Different devices have different strengths and weaknesses; if they were
equivalent, one of them wouldn't exist.

I personally have no opinion on whether a Catalyst 6500 makes a good "core
router" vs. a GSR.  That depends on what best fits your technical and business
requirements, your staff's experience, the features available, other devices in
your network, etc.  Nobody else can answer that question for you.

S



Current thread: