nanog mailing list archives
Re: whois for just prefix list
From: Russell Heilling <russell () ccie org uk>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:38:01 +0100
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 06:47:43AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
let's see o we have massive heavy servers o the most basic/frequent operation requires a massive heavy client what's wrong with this picture?
You've hit the nail on the head there. The lack of a uniform query syntax across the registries requires intelligence in the client that would otherwise not be required. Defining standard query language syntax / information presentation format across the registries is exactly why the IETF CRISP working group exists. Lets hope that as a few of their I-Ds get onto the RFC standards track we can finally get a registry structure that is so easy to use that people start keeping their objects up to date ;) -- Russell Heilling http://www.ccie.org.uk/ PGP: finger russellh () bela homeunix net
Current thread:
- Re: whois for just prefix list, (continued)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Joao Luis Silva Damas (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Arnold Nipper (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Russell Heilling (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Larry J. Blunk (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Randy Bush (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Russell Heilling (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Joao Luis Silva Damas (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Russell Heilling (Apr 14)
- Re: whois for just prefix list Joe Abley (Apr 14)