nanog mailing list archives
RE: Low AS - Number
From: "Mike (meuon) Harrison" <meuon () highertech net>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:10:34 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Dwight Ringdahl wrote:
Nope strictly for marketing reasons... ASN has almost no place in BGP selection.
Dang Geek Pride! (Still MH94 and 3901 after all these years..) It's worse than hanging around Ham radio guys with 4 digit call signs... .. Next we'll get into .. "I booted off of paper tape.." and then.. "I booted off of flip switches".. but I'm one of the few that have strung ferrites on a loom.. Martha.. get me my cane.. ------- And to get completely off topic.. Why/how would you use an ASN for marketing purposes? And should this even be considered.. except as a tongue in cheek geek thing?
Current thread:
- Low AS - Number Dwight Ringdahl (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 21)
- RE: Low AS - Number Dwight Ringdahl (Apr 21)
- RE: Low AS - Number Mike (meuon) Harrison (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Mike (meuon) Harrison (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Alec H. Peterson (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Daniel Golding (Apr 21)
- RE: Low AS - Number Dwight Ringdahl (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Jared Mauch (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Dorian Kim (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number David Barak (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Andrea Abrahamsen (Apr 21)
- Re: Low AS - Number Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 21)