nanog mailing list archives
Re: mobile.att.net dead
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:27:36 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
OK, perhaps
Back in the day when we had pagers (they still make those?), we'd find that emailing things to pagers wasn't the brightest idea around.
should have read
Back in the day when we had pagers (they still make those?), we'd find that USING IP to ACCESS OUR pagers wasn't the brightest idea around.
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, jspam () netbahamas com wrote:
If you have a clueful paging provider, they should let you do SNPP. Think of it as TAP over IP. http://www.snpp.info/
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- mobile.att.net dead Kai Schlichting (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead jspam (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 30)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Stephen Sprunk (Apr 30)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead jspam (Apr 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: mobile.att.net dead George William Herbert (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Scott Granados (Apr 29)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 30)
- Re: mobile.att.net dead Alex Rubenstein (Apr 29)