nanog mailing list archives
Re: Market-based address allocation
From: David Conrad <david.conrad () nominum com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:55:28 -0700
On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, at 07:44 AM, Bill Nickless wrote:
As a thought experiment, think of how the IPv4 addressing situation (bogon advertisements, allocations, explosion of routing table sizes, etc) would be different if the IP community treated IP addresses as a commodity.
PIARA, The Sequel. Take N+1. Action! Anybody got any rubber balls Peter Lothberg can monopolize this time? :-)
Sorry to be flip. In case you haven't already, see: http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/piara/index.shtml
Rgds, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: Market-based address allocation, (continued)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Bill Nickless (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Scott Bradner (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Bill Nickless (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Jack Bates (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Bill Nickless (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Jack Bates (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Simon Lyall (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation bmanning (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation bmanning (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 30)
- RE: Market-based address allocation David Schwartz (Apr 30)
- Re: Market-based address allocation David G. Andersen (Apr 30)