nanog mailing list archives
Tier-1 without their own backbone?
From: Rick Ernst <erond () legendz com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT)
We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac OC-3. One of the responses came back with "we won't be competive with <provider> because they don't have their own backbone. Is there a cross-reference for provider vs network backbone, or is this just something that we have to ask each provider for? I "assume" that UU, Sprint, and AT&T are self-owned backbones, but others... ? One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any comments good/bad on reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and AT&T. I also realize that the "they suck less" list changes continuously... :) Thanks, Rick
Current thread:
- Tier-1 without their own backbone? Rick Ernst (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Christopher McCrory (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Petri Helenius (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Matthew Sweet (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Leo Bicknell (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? David Diaz (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Joel Perez (Aug 27)
- RE: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Sean Crandall (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? John Palmer (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Larry Rosenman (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? Will Yardley (Aug 27)
- Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone? John Palmer (Aug 27)
(Thread continues...)