nanog mailing list archives
Re: On the back of other 'security' posts....
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
Date: 30 Aug 2003 23:05:37 +0000
matthew () sorbs net (Matthew Sullivan) writes:
..and if the perps are on this list, keep going if you want, the more you do the more likely you'll get caught. You will not force SORBS off the net like you have Osirusoft. I and SORBS will leave when we are good and ready, and not because of some infantile spotty faced 15 year old nerd without a clue on life.
these aren't script kiddies, in fact i don't think they're kids. these seem to be professional spammers whose revenue is being hurt by sorbs. the kids i've talked to think that the blackhole lists are good things, since these kids are usually spam victims and almost never spam perps. -- Paul Vixie
Current thread:
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts...., (continued)
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 30)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Matthew Crocker (Aug 31)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Owen DeLong (Aug 31)
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Owen DeLong (Aug 30)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Richard Cox (Aug 31)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Mans Nilsson (Aug 31)
- Re: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Paul Vixie (Aug 31)
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 31)
- RE: On the back of other 'security' posts.... Terry Baranski (Aug 31)