nanog mailing list archives
Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic
From: Omachonu Ogali <nanog () missnglnk com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 18:59:30 -0400
Oops, didn't fully understand the post before I hit reply. Ignore that little rant.
Current thread:
- Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Raymond, Steven (Aug 27)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 27)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 27)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 28)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 28)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 27)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic bdragon (Aug 31)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 31)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Omachonu Ogali (Aug 31)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 31)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 27)
- Re: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic Omachonu Ogali (Aug 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic JC Dill (Aug 29)
- RE: Measured Internet good v. "bad" traffic David Schwartz (Aug 29)