nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection
From: "Petri Helenius" <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:39:54 +0300
i don't know who aol is going to be able to send responses to who won't apply those same restrictions.
NAT or "content switch" are the terms that come to mind. Pete
Current thread:
- [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Leo Bicknell (Aug 07)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Will Yardley (Aug 07)
- AOL breaking dns spoof protection Geo. (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Petri Helenius (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Paul Vixie (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Petri Helenius (Aug 07)
- AOL breaking dns spoof protection Geo. (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Booth, Michael (ENG) (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Phil Rosenthal (Aug 07)
- Re: AOL breaking dns spoof protection Geo. (Aug 07)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Will Yardley (Aug 07)
- RE: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Jay Hennigan (Aug 09)
- RE: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Charles Sprickman (Aug 10)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 10)
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Randy Bush (Aug 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [connie.davis () mail internetseer com: answerpointe.cctec.com] Stewart, William C (Bill), RTSLS (Aug 10)