nanog mailing list archives
RE: RPC errors
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 02:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Sean Crandall wrote:
This worm is amazing. I have only had filters in place for about 4.5 hours and I am already approaching 100 million matches for the deny tcp/135 across my network. Of that, only one customer has said that they needed 135 open for legimate use (probably more, but I have only heard from the one).
Isnt this a perfect situation for a 135/tcp tarpit? -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- RE: RPC errors, (continued)
- RE: RPC errors Rob Thomas (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Mike Damm (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Mark Segal (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Jack Bates (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Randy Bush (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors John Palmer (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Jim Shankland (Aug 11)
- Re: RPC errors Jack Bates (Aug 12)
- Re: RPC errors Jack Bates (Aug 11)
- RE: RPC errors Dan Hollis (Aug 12)
- Re: RPC errors Henry Linneweh (Aug 12)
- Re: RPC errors - DDoS on the 16th? Eric Kuhnke (Aug 12)