RE: VoIP QOS best practices

["Ray Burkholder" <ray () oneunified net>]

Many boxes are able to reorder packets.  If packets arrive too late to
be inserted into the conversion stream, they are dropped.  One dropped
packet in a sequence can usually be 'hidden' or 'faked' by the codec.
When more than one packet is missed in sequence, it becomes noticeable
to the listener.

Ray Burkholder


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bicknell () ufp org] 
> Sent: February 10, 2003 14:44
> To: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: VoIP QOS best practices
>
>
> In a message written on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 01:19:08PM 
> -0500, chaim fried wrote:
> > happens). There is no reason to implement QOS on the Core. 
> Having said
> > that, there still seems to be too many issues on the tier 1 networks
> > with pacekt reordering as they affect h.261/h.263 traffic. 
>
>
> So what's the real problem here?  Are the VOIP boxes unable to
> handle out of order packets?  Do the out of order packets simply
> arrive far enough delayed to blow the delay budget?  What 
> percentage of
> reordered packets starts to cause issues?
>
> -- 
>        Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
>         PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org