nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ]
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:37:27 -0500 (EST)
Unnamed Administration sources reported that William Warren said:
It seems that it would be in the isp's interests then to not get itself into those restrictive contracts. If the customer does not like it they can go elsewhere.
Note that the ISP's interests are not equal to the individual sales[wo]man's..... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ] Martin Hannigan (Feb 10)
- Re: Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ] Alif The Terrible (Feb 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ] Mike Damm (Feb 11)
- Re: Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ] William Warren (Feb 11)
- Re: Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ] David Lesher (Feb 12)
- Re: Spam Cost Resources [ trustworthy ] William Warren (Feb 11)