nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Peering Request
From: Mike Leber <mleber () he net>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:54:15 -0800 (PST)
We also do IPv6 BGP4+ via the tunnel broker as well, although he would need to correspond with ipv6 () he net to get that setup. We've been setting up more native IPv6 sessions at Telehouse in New York and at PAIX in Palo Alto (soon Equinix Ashburn and Equinix San Jose as well). We are now tagging routes we hear via tunnels with a community so that people that hear them from us can preference based on that (native vs tunnelled) if they wish. Mike. On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, fingers wrote:
Jeffrey Wheat said: "so brokers are no an option for us".last I checked a tunnel+bgp worked from he.net worked on a cisco not sure if i'd call it peering tho
+----------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -----------------+ | Mike Leber Direct Internet Connections Voice 510 580 4100 | | Hurricane Electric Web Hosting Colocation Fax 510 580 4151 | | mleber () he net http://www.he.net | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
Current thread:
- IPv6 Peering Request Jeffrey Wheat (Feb 14)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Mike Leber (Feb 14)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Nicolas DEFFAYET (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request fingers (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Mike Leber (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Mike Leber (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Scott Granados (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Nicolas DEFFAYET (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Nicolas DEFFAYET (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 Peering Request Mike Leber (Feb 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 Peering Request Irwin Lazar (Feb 16)
- RE: IPv6 Peering Request Jeffrey Wheat (Feb 18)